Washington tribes and environmental organizations filed lawsuits in U. S. District Court for Western Washington on Tuesday challenging the Trump administration's decision to rescind the legal definition of 'harm' under the Endangered Species Act. The Department of the Interior announced the rule change on July 10, stating it would reduce permitting requirements and compliance costs for farmers, landowners, and energy producers. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said the change 'restores common sense' and respects private property. However, the tribes and environmental groups argue the rule change poses greater risks for species like salmon, steelhead, grizzly bears, and northern spotted owls. The rule change is based on a 2024 Supreme Court ruling, according to the Department of the Interior. The lawsuits are ongoing and will determine whether the rule change will be upheld or overturned.
Tribes, environmental groups sue over ESA rule change
π Listen Β· narrated by Aiden
π Source: Tacoma Daily Index β https://www.tacomadailyindex.com/
Source receipts13 of 15 claims supported Β· 87%
Legacy automated check: the original source text was not preserved. These earlier verdicts have not passed the current publication checks and may contain errors. Source: original document β
- βWashington tribes and environmental organizations filed lawsuits in U. S. District Court for Western WashingtonβThe two separate lawsuits, filed in U.S. District Court for Western Washington, challenge the Trump administration’s decision to rescind the legal definition of the word “harm” as used under the Endangered Species Act.β
- βThe lawsuits were filed on TuesdayβWashington tribes and environmental organizations sued the federal government Tuesday, arguing that recent changes to Endangered Species Act rules defy scientific research and pave the way for the destruction of important wildlife habitat.β
- βThe lawsuits challenge the Trump administration's decision to rescind the legal definition of 'harm' under the Endangered Species ActβThe two separate lawsuits, filed in U.S. District Court for Western Washington, challenge the Trump administration’s decision to rescind the legal definition of the word “harm” as used under the Endangered Species Act.β
- βThe Department of the Interior announced the rule change on July 10βIn a July 10 announcement , the Department of the Interior said the new rule would reduce permitting requirements and compliance costs for farmers, landowners and energy producers.β
- βThe rule change would reduce permitting requirements and compliance costs for farmers, landowners, and energy producersβIn a July 10 announcement, the Department of the Interior said the new rule would reduce permitting requirements and compliance costs for farmers, landowners and energy producers.β
- βInterior Secretary Doug Burgum said the change 'restores common sense'β"For years, federal agencies abused the ESA to obstruct lawful land use and burden American families and businesses," said Interior Secretary Doug Burgum. "This action restores common sense, respects private property, provides much-needed certainty for landowners and follows the statute Congress actually passed."β
- βInterior Secretary Doug Burgum said the change respects private propertyβ"For years, federal agencies abused the ESA to obstruct lawful land use and burden American families and businesses," said Interior Secretary Doug Burgum. "This action restores common sense, respects private property, provides much-needed certainty for landowners and follows the statute Congress actually passed."β
- βThe tribes and environmental groups argue the rule change poses greater risks for species like salmonβBut the environmental groups and tribes contend that the change will pose greater risks for species like salmon, steelhead, grizzly bears and northern spotted owls.β
- βThe tribes and environmental groups argue the rule change poses greater risks for species like steelheadβBut the environmental groups and tribes contend that the change will pose greater risks for species like salmon, steelhead, grizzly bears and northern spotted owls.β
- βThe tribes and environmental groups argue the rule change poses greater risks for species like grizzly bearsβBut the environmental groups and tribes contend that the change will pose greater risks for species like salmon, steelhead, grizzly bears and northern spotted owls.β
- βThe tribes and environmental groups argue the rule change poses greater risks for species like northern spotted owlsβBut the environmental groups and tribes contend that the change will pose greater risks for species like salmon, steelhead, grizzly bears and northern spotted owls.β
- βThe rule change is based on a 2024 Supreme Court rulingβThe rule is underpinned by a 2024 Supreme Court ruling, according to the Department of the Interior announcement.β
- βThe rule change is based on a Supreme Court ruling according to the Department of the InteriorβThe rule is underpinned by a 2024 Supreme Court ruling, according to the Department of the Interior announcement.β
- β The lawsuits are ongoingNo usable supporting receipt β unverified.
- β The lawsuits will determine whether the rule change will be upheld or overturnedNo usable supporting receipt β unverified.
The Tacoma Wire is free. Get Tacoma's news delivered every morning.